A Civics Lesson
Posted in general on May 31st, 2005So, yes, I’m back from DC. And it was quite a trip. As you’ll note from this flash-photography-forbidden-on-pain-of-death photo, I paid a visit to the U.S. National Archives, and viewed the argon-filled laser-cut cases that preserve the printed constitution, even as its actual provisions are shortly to be rendered quaint. (BTW: the Constitution and Declaration are now supposed to be refered to as “The Charters of Freedom,” as in “Operation Iraqi” or as in “-Loving” or as in the not Peace but Faith-based “Freedom Corps.”)
Washington was interesting, and sort of disturbing, in ways I’m sure you’d expect. Everying is behind planters and little hydralulic flip-gates. Camera-containing smokey domes sprout like gargoyles from the corners of every building, and you imagine that in some secure sub-basement, gargoyle-like figures peer out from these cameras, all twisted up as a consequence of maintaining their suspicious gaze.
And all around the place are shiny new fences, and on each fence is a metal sign: LONG FENCE. As if a single LONG FENCE has descended across the capital. Or sprouted from beneath it. The pervasive and intense efforts at securing the place are visible everywhere.
But, still, my visit was grand. Just for kicks, I tried posting a few pictures from the trip here on Flickr. You’ll see 16 haphazard pics there, since I was a little confused about how to use the much-vaunted Flickr, and am a little too busy to re-arrange or post more pics at just this very moment.
The best part of the trip was seeing some old (and new) friends. Perhaps the second best was the short film I watched in the National Archives prior to viewing the Declaration of Independence (as pictured above). Washington was, umm, abuzz with the possiblity that the senate filibuster would be “nuked” by a Republican majority determined to install Priscilla Owen et. al. on the fedeal bench. The film on the declaration (perhaps scripted by a Freedom-hating archivist?) mentioned that the buisness about “self-evident truths” and so forth at the top of the declaration had been for the signers mostly a rhetorical flourish, and that the substance of the document was the ennumeration of complaints against George III that comprises the bulk of declaration. Complaints against the King’s tyranny, such as:
“He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices”
Ah, yes. The text of the Declaration is faded and nearly unreadable. But you can take a look at it here.
Among the complaints against the Tyranical GIII:
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers. . . .
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power. . .
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury.
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences . . .
He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
Meet the old George–same as the new George. Or pretty close. Especially if you view the Declaration through the lens of some of George V’s newer colonial posessions.


You know what’s sort of fun? Being sick. Not “total agony” sick, or “I’m about to perish” sick, but just regular old sick. It’s a break in Ordinary Time, sent from some beyond, to briefly transform things.