The Grudge
I’ve had perhaps just a little too much fun this weekend. Out and about at the Esquire Friday night, and then spent yesterday grading with sarah in the afternoon, then viewing _The Grudge_ with Dana and Christina, finally kicking back at Sanjay’s birthday/Diwali party, before being carted home once again by the kindly rachel s. But ok, about the movie…

The Grudge, I’ve decided is recommendable. Takishi Shimizu directs this Americanized remake of his own Ju-On (which I missed when it was briefly at the New Art a few weeks ago).
Critical opinion on the film is interestingly divided, and if you decide to see it, you might well decide that there’s not much there but a lot of Boo!-saying. But I think I’d disagree.
As we left the film Dana asked why it was set in Japan, to which I lamely asked: “Well, why it shouldn’t it have been?” And as we drove home, we mostly discussed various plot issues, and I found myself sort of defending the film from Christina’s questions about its plot. My line was that the nature and capabilities of the Grudge couldn’t/shouldn’t have been spelled-out too specifically.
The film thematizes unintelligibility, which is one reason it’s interesting that this remake focuses on Americans in Japan. As I watched the film, I kept being remained of the excellent _Lost in Translation_, where a kind of pleasure in keeping a kind of loose grasp on things and ideas and people is described. But _The Grudge_ find in such looseness a kind of helplessness in the face of people and realities that threaten to grasp one with a kind of deadly fixity. Sexual obsession, childlike neediness, obsessional rage, and finally death here countervail the pleasurable dream-state of LIT. (jeeze does Ebert miss the point on this one).
The film plays with this, as the Americans repeatedly struggle to communicate with people around them, or simply to obtain food or move about the city. This gets racialized when a hapless white American professor doesn’t notice he’s being stalked by a person whom he fails to recognize among in sea of Asians who to him are apparently as indistinguishable as they are “inscrutable.”
Like LIT then, The Grudge is always in danger of slipping into essentialized or even racist descriptions. When Detective Nakagawa tells S. Michelle Gellar about Japanese beliefs about the dead, the film veers close to an easy kind of exoticism, which also appears early in the film when Gellar’s character peers over a wall into a Shinto cemetery to watch the natives burn incense to help keep in touch w/their ancestors.
The Grudge seemed a little flat to me at first, but is better on reflection. I like how cramped and compact the evil house is — how you can never even see the house a whole. And how the wide modern spaces of the City contrast with the convoluted neighborhood. How the evil ghosts are so pointedly figures of the bitterly powerless. The surly child or sullen girl, who’s look expresses a desire to devour and destroy that can be ignored only on the assumption of this person’s powerlessness. Of the wife, son, and dad who die in the house to inaugurate its evil ways, only the wife and son come back as grudgers. Their scariness depends on their hostile helplessness. The dynamic is familiar.
Which brings us back maybe to the question of racial and cultural suspicion, which always lingers in this film (when first trying to find the evil house, Gellar approaches a Japanese mother and her child. The mother politely answer’s G.’s question, but gently pulls her kid away from Gellar when G tries to be friendly). In this context of hostility and and incomensurability, it’s hard not to read the film’s abiding preoccupation with eye-shape in terms that are at least partly racial.
At the moment before the Grudge ghosts kill, and at other more random intervals, the eyes of the ghost become suddenly preternaturally wide. This is automatically scary. Normally one’s eyes narrow before attacking someone, and the reverse is horrifying in a Bataille kind of obscene way, race or no race. But here eye shape is racialized, too. Like anime-style animation, that draws figures in a way influenced by American post WWII cartoons, and that produces characters with weird more Caucasian-than-Caucasian eye-shapes, the Grudge presents its white victims with a last vision of a face that like Anime after WWII, offers back a spectacle of weird reflected whiteness to those it’s about to consume.
So this then, is my answer to Dana about _The Grudge_ being set in Japan.
[p.s. reminds me of the BBC news report I heard a few days ago about Japanese nationalism. The BBC announcer actually referred to the post-WWII provision in the Japanese constitution prohibiting a standing army as an act of “castration.”]

November 15th, 2004 at 11:03 pm
Jesus H. Fuckin’ Christ on a pogo stick! I just heard Condi Rice is going to be the new secretary of state and my eyes gots wider than that little kid makin’ cat noises! So much for cultural specificity as I’m about as white a guy as there is…I’ll be good. Sigh!
November 15th, 2004 at 11:45 pm
And yet, I fear Rice may be among the best of B.’s appointments. Even more disturbing, of course, is this guy.
November 16th, 2004 at 12:08 am
I have to say that i think this may be the scariest movie i’ve ever seen. I think there was one point during the movie where i relaxed enought to realize my knuckles were white and i hadn’t been breathing.
It’s interesting you bring up LIT in comparision with this. I think my reactions to both of these movies (much different from those of my counterparts in the US, it seems) were affected by my being abroad. LIT felt to me less like a celebration of the freedom of being a stranger and more like a strained and manic search for anything meaningful in the midst of (what seems to the characters to be) chaos. I’m sure this is an accurate description of me at the time, too.
I think you’re right that there is something up with the depictions of race in this movie, but I want to think more about that.
November 16th, 2004 at 11:33 am
Deino: I too found the grudge scary. Oddly at least half my Engineering students had seen the film, and few found it frightening at all.
I liked LIT, too, and I agree w/you to some extent about the search for meaning in the film. Still, nobody in LIT seems exactly Ahab-like in their dedication to the hunt… The tone the film strikes towards the hunt for meaning is difficult to describe, and part of what I like abt the film.
I’m not sure abt. the “race” thing either. I don’t endorse a category of race separable from culture, of course. And the location of my observations re race at the end of my comments isn’t meant to establish race as the film’s final secret meaning. Plus I have my doubts abt. the eye thing. But race/culture/language are/is in the mix here, along with questions of power and resentment and of who controls whom.